When Pujara and Murali Vijay reached their centuries in the
recent Test match at Hyderabad, what impressed me most was the manner in which
they reacted after reaching the milestone. A sheepish, self-effacing grin,
raising of the bat in acknowledgement of the cheer from the crowd – that was
all the celebration.
I had also seen a New Zealand batsman – I think the name is
Williamson – who looked almost apologetic for scoring a hundred and gracefully
accepted the cheer from the crowd and recently Ingram of South Africa impressed
me with his very pleasant demeanour on reaching a hundred. All these
achievements looked bigger because they made them look like it is routine
business! And no histrionics - show of anger, jumping up etc.,
I was impressed because I have seen some Indian batsmen showing anger on attaining this – what are they angry about and at whom is the anger directed? Is it not a moment to be happy and be proud of? I remember the legendary Sunil Gavaskar, commenting on these lines when some Indian batsman (safer for me not to name him!) reached his hundred runs.
This led me to reflect on the game of cricket as was played
say about three decades back and now – yes, I admit those days it was a
leisurely game and nowadays it is a fierce game – because there is more
‘moolah’ in the game than before and you have to be consistently performing to
be in the reckoning. But does it licence you to gnash your teeth in anger? How many of you will believe it when I say that there was a rest day after three days of Test cricket and the play resumed on the fourth day! Really a game of leisure for pleasure!
Cricket was (please note the past tense) a gentleman’s game
– if a bowler bowled a very good ball and the batsman had difficulty in playing
it, there was a slight nod of the head from the batsman in appreciation and acknowledgement of
the bowler’s effort; if a batsman score a hundred, even the opposition
applauded it; if a batsman played a caressing cover drive or elegantly glanced the ball off his
legs or deliciously square cut a ball, it was appreciated by the fielding side.
Do you see such things these days? I am afraid not!
Neville Cardus, that great critic of the game, would turn in
his grave if he ever had to watch the matches these days. He wrote about cricket as a gentleman's game. It was sheer poetry
to read his reviews on the game and every good effort of the players on the
field came in for rightful applause from his pen.
How did this change happen? The Australians were the first
to reject the idea of appreciating the opponents’ prowess and achievements? The
youngsters in the team were actively encouraged not to admire the technique,
exquisiteness of batsman-ship or the guiles of the bowlers. For them opponents
meant just that and no applause please!
Of course there have been some legends of cricket like Dr.
W.G.Grace who carried their charisma to levels unthinkable today. I recollect a
story – rather two stories.
The first is – WCG came to open the innings and was bowled
first ball; he promptly said ‘that was a good trial ball’, now let’s get on
with the game!’. And everybody obeyed!
The second story goes like this. WCG was given out lbw ( to
the uninitiated, this means ‘leg before the wicket’); When an umpire gave him
out lbw before he had scored any run, he told the umpire, ‘young man, the crowd
has come to see me bat, not how you umpire’ and continued to bat. Such was his
personality that the opposition could not rebut him.
I also recall the quote a by a Japanese General during the
World War II in the film ‘The Bridge on the river Kwai” starring Sir Alec
Guinesse. In one scene, the Japanese General slaps the British General Sir Alec
and says ‘ This is war not a game of cricket’, clearly defining the game as
that of gentlemen.
Can we consider today’s cricket as gentlemen’s game – you see
ugly scenes of one up-man-ship, heckling and what not!
Can such things happen these days (I admit WCG was not
right). But that was the spirit of the game. A game played for pleasure and not
for public demonstration of one’s anger etc.!
Can we get back to those days? I wonder!
Evolution leads to new revelations....Welcome to the Cricketmania 2013- Cheer girls, betting mafia, business links and investments, endorsement deals, media frenzy, celebrity cults and sledging......Its a new day today and a new way today I may wish less and regret more, but its a new high today.;)
ReplyDeleteThe blog has a beautiful new look, but the flow of words remains the same. Getting back to those old days? Like when GRV called back a batsman after he was declared out or Toney Greig lifting GRV after he made an excellent hundred? An Alvin Kallicharan innings on a bad fifth day wicket geeing a combined ovation from the Indian team? Not any more.............
ReplyDelete